Preppy is the New Hipster

Friday, September 05, 2008

 

Questions that really matter...

Whose better looking democrats or republicans?

Okay, so. Typically my answer has always been Republicans...the way I see it, there are two inter-related explanations for this, 1-I went through my years of sexual exploration (hopefully they aren't over...fingers crossed) when Bush was in the white house (well Clinton too lets be honest, but I was still a guppy at that point). and 2-I'm a power junkie. Another secondary reason, was this elongated southern phase that i went through at some point. I like the way they say my first name, and the bow-ties are just hot. RSK was kind of the icing on the cake of this phase, having it all save the bow-tie.

I think times they may be a changin' and I don't mean that is the populist Obama way, I mean it is the superficial Ruthie B way of basing political choice on aesthetics. I mean duh, its not new.

So I have been watching the DNC and the RNC on nytimes clips. So much for the Michael Jackson song, 'dont matter if your black or white'(one of my all time favs). I think I saw like 5 shots of black people at the RNC. The DNC enjoyed a much higher percentage of white people, young white people. Anyway so here is the skinny on levels of attractiveness of the political parties

DNC-lots of weepy superemotional(based on racial segregation, and the so-called need for american unity), young-ish, mostly moderately attractive multi-ethnic people, starting to look better the closer obama gets to the white house. I think we can thank michele obama's stylist and her jackie 'o steeling tactics for a boost since the clinton years.

RNC-lots of weepy superemotional(though unclear as to why, bc they are scarred of iran, russia?) doughy pastey mid-westerners, older, flabby. there are some token hottie in bow-ties and some barbie looking cindy mccain wannabes, but mostly just a stale looking crowd.

I have to keep thinking about this, more on it later, there is too much information to convey here.

Comments:
My thinking on this is as such: yes, the GOPers probably have a higher percentage of your "traditionally" pretty people, conforming to your standard beauty ideals - the blonde chearleaders and lantern-jawed jocks of the world. If, however, you (like, I think, most right-minded individuals) prefer a bit of beautiful imperfection, or even just fun style or visual flair - some personality - Dems got it going on. Of course, then there's this:

http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/News/story?id=180291
 
I probably should clarify here that independents are pretty much where i think its at. anyone with that much commitment to label themselves as one or the other i find a little off-putting, since you cant really be an ironic rep/dem, right? i know i am a bit adolescent about this, but eh, why not!
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   March 2008   June 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?